"Steve in Manhattan" (blogenfreude01)
04/08/2016 at 09:46 • Filed to: None
0
6|
"Steve in Manhattan" (blogenfreude01)
04/08/2016 at 09:46 • Filed to: None | 0
| 6 |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
spanfucker retire bitch
> Steve in Manhattan
04/08/2016 at 09:51 |
|
Boy, I should think you’d get a lot farther in a lawsuit if you actually started off with proving they use a defeat device, rather than running off an assumption that they do.
Leon711
> spanfucker retire bitch
04/08/2016 at 09:54 |
|
I think that too, but hey I’m no lawyer.
|
Steve in Manhattan
> Steve in Manhattan
04/08/2016 at 10:01 |
|
I am a lawyer, and you have to do discovery to get documents to figure out what’s going on. Apparently these guys figure they can get to that stage of the lawsuit - i.e. get past the inevitable motion to dismiss. And I wonder if this is going to be VW - deny deny deny, then shrug and admit it.
TheTurbochargedSquirrel
> Steve in Manhattan
04/08/2016 at 10:20 |
|
Hey there giving owners of VW diesels lots of money. I also own a diesel but it is a Mercedes, maybe they will give me money too!
That’s a bit of a reach there guys.
AMGtech - now with more recalls!
> Steve in Manhattan
04/08/2016 at 10:31 |
|
Curious to see how this plays out. They’ve tried before but haven’t gotten anywhere. They’re accusations are all over the board, first it was “over 65x the limit”, then 8-19, and also 31. Can I sue the weather man because his forecast was wrong?
|
Steve in Manhattan
> AMGtech - now with more recalls!
04/08/2016 at 11:28 |
|
They’ll hire experts for discovery and trial - on both sides. VW’s only real defense will be to prove no harm to the owners, but they’ll need a fix that doesn’t affect performance, which may be impossible. Damage calculations will involve the diminished value of the cars. I don’t know a whole lot about the case so this is mostly spitballing. And this tarnishes one of my favorite methods of propulsion - the diesel engine.